ABOUT

Clark Hill is an international team of legal advisors focused on delivering exceptional growth for your business. With locations spanning across the United States, Ireland, and Mexico, we work in agile, collaborative teams, partnering with our clients to help them reach and exceed their business goals. For more information, please visit clarkhill.com

 

 

 

 

Login

 

CONTACT

Stephon B. Bagne

Member, Clark Hill PLC

Phone: (313) 965-8897

Fax: (313) 309-6897

Email: sbagne@clarkhill.com

 

Stephon B. Bagne’s expertise in representing property owners in condemnation cases is widely recognized. Stephon has represented all types of property owners in a variety of situations including vacant and improved property, partial and total takings, easement and fee acquisitions, involving commercial and residential properties. He has won jury trials in courts throughout the State of Michigan and successfully defended those verdicts before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Stephon has prevailed in challenges of the necessity of takings and negotiated less onerous acquisitions in partial taking matters. He regularly speaks and writes about eminent domain and other real estate law issues for a variety of professional organizations. For a more complete bio, please click here.

 

 

 

 

« Michigan Electric Transmission Company Evaluating New Nelson Road to Oneida Project in Gratiot, Clinton, Ionia, and Eaton Counties | Main | Sixth Circuit Extends Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine »
Wednesday
Jun072023

US Supreme Court Unanimously Rules that Governments Cannot Retain the Excess Value of Foreclosed Homes

This recent opinion conforms federal law to a recent Michigan opinion.

On May 25, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued Tyler v Hennepin County, Minn. In this case, a property owner owed $15,000 in back taxes. The County foreclosed and sold the property for $40,000. The Supreme Court held that it was an unconstitutional taking for the County to retain more than was needed to pay the back taxes and the fees associated with the foreclosure process. The Constitution  is violated if a tax foreclosure process “provides no opportunity for the taxpayer to recover the excess value” beyond what it owed.

This opinion applies the same logic the Michigan Supreme Court used in 2020 in a case called Rafaeli, LLC v Oakland County.

Note that the US Supreme Court did not require the foreclosing government agency to automatically reimburse the excess. A prior decision deemed a statutory process whereby a property owner could seek to recover the excess. Michigan’s legislature has adopted such a process. Therefore, a property owner suffering a foreclosure needs to monitor the situation and follow the statutory process to recover any excess proceeds.

This is an important ruling that protects property owners who are struggling financially.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>