ABOUT

Clark Hill is an international team of legal advisors focused on delivering exceptional growth for your business. With locations spanning across the United States, Ireland, and Mexico, we work in agile, collaborative teams, partnering with our clients to help them reach and exceed their business goals. For more information, please visit clarkhill.com

 

 

 

 

Login

 

CONTACT

Stephon B. Bagne

Member, Clark Hill PLC

Phone: (313) 965-8897

Fax: (313) 309-6897

Email: sbagne@clarkhill.com

 

Stephon B. Bagne’s expertise in representing property owners in condemnation cases is widely recognized. Stephon has represented all types of property owners in a variety of situations including vacant and improved property, partial and total takings, easement and fee acquisitions, involving commercial and residential properties. He has won jury trials in courts throughout the State of Michigan and successfully defended those verdicts before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Stephon has prevailed in challenges of the necessity of takings and negotiated less onerous acquisitions in partial taking matters. He regularly speaks and writes about eminent domain and other real estate law issues for a variety of professional organizations. For a more complete bio, please click here.

 

 

 

 

« Would Proposed Prohibitions Against Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles Constitute Takings of Gas Station Properties? | Main | ITC Limits Access Rights in Mountain Project »
Wednesday
Mar082023

ITC Planning Massive Electrical Line Expansion Project 

ITC is planning 18 transmission projects as part of the Long-Range Transmission Plan.

A recent New York Times article discussed the challenges that developers of alternative energy sources have when trying to connect proposed projects to the existing electrical grid. According to the article, “The energy transition poised for takeoff in the United States amid record investment in wind, solar and other low-carbon technologies is facing a serious obstacle: The volume of projects has overwhelmed the nation’s antiquated systems to connect new sources of electricity to homes and businesses. So many projects are trying to squeeze through the approval process that delays can drag on for years, leaving some developers to throw up their hands and walk away. More than 8,100 energy projects — the vast majority of them wind, solar and batteries — were waiting for permission to connect to electric grids at the end of 2021, up from 5,600 the year before, jamming the system known as interconnection.”

Reading this article and the recent issues that I have handled relating to solar farms inspired me to check to see if any major new projects are planned to address Michigan’s electrical grid.  And yes, there are major projects being contemplated.

ITC has published a fact sheet discussing a “$10.3 billion investment” that “includes 18 transmission projects in MISO’s Midwest Subregion.” MISO stands for Midcontinent Independent System Operator and according to its website it “is an independent, not-for-profit, member-based organization focused on three critical tasks: Managing the flow of high-voltage electricity across 15 U.S. states and the Canadian province of Manitoba; Facilitating one of the world's largest energy markets with more than $40 billion in annual transactions; and Planning the grid of the future.”  ITC provided a map of the proposed projects. 


ITC has already gone public with some of its planning initiatives. For example, on December 14, 2022, ITC sent a letter to the Controller of Montcalm County asking for input about the Nelson Road to Oneida Project, which includes a 345-kV electrical transmission line in mid-Michigan.

These will be major projects that will take years to implement. For 345kV lines, ITC will need to obtain regulatory approval. Obtaining regulatory approval will be significant in terms of establishing the ability to use eminent domain to acquire the necessary property rights. The acquisition of a permit significantly reduces court oversight over a project. “The granting of a permanent or temporary certificate by the public service commission or by a federal agency authorized by federal law to make determinations of public convenience and necessity as to condemnation constitutes a prima facie case that the project in furtherance of which the particular parcel would be acquired is required by the public convenience and necessity.” MCL 213.56(3).

A project of this nature will result in significant amounts of eminent domain litigation with ITC. I have handled hundreds of cases against ITC and regularly increase the just compensation paid while decreasing the impact of the property rights on owners. For example, this blog post details concessions made by ITC in terms of limiting access to industrial properties where I am challenging the just compensation offers to the owners. This blog post discusses significant concessions about the manner of construction of a sidewalk project and an increase in just compensation.

If you have been approached by a utility company like ITC about a property acquisition, please feel free to contact me.

 

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>