ABOUT

Clark Hill is an international team of legal advisors focused on delivering exceptional growth for your business. With locations spanning across the United States, Ireland, and Mexico, we work in agile, collaborative teams, partnering with our clients to help them reach and exceed their business goals. For more information, please visit clarkhill.com

 

 

 

 

Login

 

CONTACT

Stephon B. Bagne

Member, Clark Hill PLC

Phone: (313) 965-8897

Fax: (313) 309-6897

Email: sbagne@clarkhill.com

 

Stephon B. Bagne’s expertise in representing property owners in condemnation cases is widely recognized. Stephon has represented all types of property owners in a variety of situations including vacant and improved property, partial and total takings, easement and fee acquisitions, involving commercial and residential properties. He has won jury trials in courts throughout the State of Michigan and successfully defended those verdicts before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Stephon has prevailed in challenges of the necessity of takings and negotiated less onerous acquisitions in partial taking matters. He regularly speaks and writes about eminent domain and other real estate law issues for a variety of professional organizations. For a more complete bio, please click here.

 

 

 

 

« Successful Negotiation of Sidewalk Easement | Main | Will Proposed New Military Aircraft Low Flight Patterns Result in Takings? »
Friday
Feb102023

Interesting Article Advocating Ability to Use Existing Options to Expand Electrical Grid

A recent article advocates the use of existing legislation to expand the electrical grid to facilitate greater use of renewable energy, which, if implemented, will require use of eminent domain.

This blog focuses primarily upon remedies that property owners enjoy when confronted with the use of eminent domain against them. However, it is also interesting to be abreast of issues that could result in greater use of condemnation in the future.

Four authors, Avi Zevin, Sam Walsh, Justin Gundlach, and Isabel Carey, collaborated to publish Building a New Grid without New Legislation: A Path to Revitalizing Federal Transmission Authorities in Ecology Law Quarterly. The article asserts that “there is now broad agreement (if not a consensus) that new long-distance, high-voltage transmission lines will be indispensable if the United States is to integrate enough renewable energy generation to decarbonize the electric system in a timely manner, and to do so cost-effectively.” The authors assert that while new legislation would be the best way to facilitate the creation of new transmission lines, it is not the only way. They go on to discuss (in 72 pages) how the use of existing legislation could allow the creation of those transmission lines despite existing legal challenges. 

While this is a technical, academic discourse about the state of the law, it is most interesting to me because it acknowledges the need to create more transmission lines to support things like wind turbines and solar farms. Of course, acquiring those property rights would involve use of eminent domain.

I have been involved in many projects acquiring new utility lines, including electrical transmission and various pipelines. I have observed many property owners (who I did not represent) convey more rights than were necessary while being paid less money than clients that I represented. For example, I have seen property owners sell the right to construct multiple lines or pipelines for less than my clients were paid when the right to construct a single line was acquired.

Long story short, if a utility company requests property rights, engaging experienced eminent domain counsel can help you through the process.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>