ABOUT

Clark Hill is an international team of legal advisors focused on delivering exceptional growth for your business. With locations spanning across the United States, Ireland, and Mexico, we work in agile, collaborative teams, partnering with our clients to help them reach and exceed their business goals. For more information, please visit clarkhill.com

 

 

 

 

Login

 

CONTACT

Stephon B. Bagne

Member, Clark Hill PLC

Phone: (313) 965-8897

Fax: (313) 309-6897

Email: sbagne@clarkhill.com

 

Stephon B. Bagne’s expertise in representing property owners in condemnation cases is widely recognized. Stephon has represented all types of property owners in a variety of situations including vacant and improved property, partial and total takings, easement and fee acquisitions, involving commercial and residential properties. He has won jury trials in courts throughout the State of Michigan and successfully defended those verdicts before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Stephon has prevailed in challenges of the necessity of takings and negotiated less onerous acquisitions in partial taking matters. He regularly speaks and writes about eminent domain and other real estate law issues for a variety of professional organizations. For a more complete bio, please click here.

 

 

 

 

« PRE-LAWSUIT CONDEMNATION ISSUES | Main | MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICES COMMISSION APPROVES ITC WEEDS LAKE PROJECT; CONDEMNATION MAY FOLLOW »
Friday
Aug162013

OSHTEMO TOWNSHIP APPEALING MPSC DECISION ALLOWING ITC TO PROCEED WITH WEEDS LAKE PROJECT

Oshtemo Township has announced its intention to appeal an MPSC ruling favorable to International Transmission Company (“ITC”), delaying condemnations.

Following closed session discussions, Oshtemo Township has announced that it will appeal the Michigan Public Service Commissions’ (“MPSC”) ruling.  This will delay condemnation acquisitions by ITC for its planned electrical transmission lines.  To read an article on MLive discussing this appeal, click here.

On one hand, the MPSC has approved the project.  On the other hand, an appeal might overrule that decision.  A potential developer or buyer of property in the area that would be affected by the project would likely be deterred by the uncertainty surrounding the status of this project.  Therefore, the uncertainty will create a negative effect on the value of property potentially being impacted by the project. 

If ITC ultimately prevails, any uncertainty created by the pendency of the project must be disregarded when valuing property before the taking.  Michigan eminent domain law is consistent with federal law.  The effects of the contemplation of a project must be disregarded when appraising property’s value before the taking.  I prepared a more lengthy article discussing this issue for Laches, a magazine published by the Oakland County Bar Association, along with other eminent domain issues.  While that article is older (it is hard to believe it was published eleven years ago), the discussion about this rule of law remains true today.  To read that article, click here

If you have any questions about eminent domain or condemnation issues, please do not hesitate to contact me.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>